Analysis of the ratings system
OFFLINE #43
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:59 PM
November 29th.
OFFLINE #44
Posted 26 September 2008 - 05:08 PM
OFFLINE #45
Posted 01 October 2008 - 09:54 PM
Bullshit. If this was true then why is the ABC/SBS percentage so much higher then it was back in the ACNielsen days?
Edited by Nahcoob, 01 October 2008 - 10:18 PM.
OFFLINE #46
Posted 01 October 2008 - 10:08 PM
I Agree, it makes no sense that all the ratings boxes would be in one area in any city.
"Today the west - tomorrow the world?"
Nup
OFFLINE #48
Posted 01 October 2008 - 10:12 PM
"Today the west - tomorrow the world?"
Nup
the ratings markets are divided up into sub-regions, so Melbourne is cut up into 4 or 5 regions, and Sydney and other capitals would be the same and data would be collected as such. So it is not possible to assign all people meters in one region and also because that would not give an adequate sample for the whole market.
OFFLINE #49
Posted 01 October 2008 - 10:15 PM
Not everyone would want their viewing habits recorded though.
OFFLINE #50
Posted 01 October 2008 - 10:17 PM
The BBC and others have interactive services that work over the air a little like the internet, but they're still one way. They are looking developing technology to let you browse internet content using a set-top box, IIRC it was connected with their new Freesat platform.
OFFLINE #51
Posted 01 October 2008 - 10:17 PM
all they need to do is merge a ratings box with a digital tuner and voila!
OFFLINE #52
Posted 01 October 2008 - 10:20 PM
Maybe if they did that, then gave them to people for free as long as they promised they would allow OzTAM to monitor them for life..
OFFLINE #54
Posted 20 October 2008 - 05:00 PM
If a network is going through a sharp decline in ratings e.g channel 10 ratings from week 42 which it was at 20.5%, if this keeps on slipping and say in a few weeks becomes 11.5%,
What is the action of a network if it keeps on declining in ratings, e.g worst case scenario?
OFFLINE #55
Posted 20 October 2008 - 05:04 PM
What is the action of a network if it keeps on declining in ratings, e.g worst case scenario?
Worst case scenario: the network is completely bankrupt, has no interested buyers, and it can't afford to pay its license fee. Then said license would be suspended, and the government would look for bidders and a new television network would develop.
OFFLINE #56
Posted 20 October 2008 - 05:06 PM
If a network is going through a sharp decline in ratings e.g channel 10 ratings from week 42 which it was at 20.5%, if this keeps on slipping and say in a few weeks becomes 11.5%,
What is the action of a network if it keeps on declining in ratings, e.g worst case scenario?
they just have to keep going until (a) they find something that fixes the situation (b) go broke or © sell sell sell .. of course (b) would probably lead to © anyway...
OFFLINE #57
Posted 20 October 2008 - 06:11 PM
Would i be right/wrong about coming to a conclusion that ten fit's either 1 or more of the above, having said that i see that SBS rates very low according to what i see compared to that of the other 4 networks so it could either mean that sbs would be slowly dying would it be True/False
OFFLINE #58
Posted 20 October 2008 - 06:20 PM
SBS is government-funded and set in legislation, it's quite different to an independent, commercial station like Ten.
OFFLINE #59
Posted 21 October 2008 - 06:51 PM
and SBS' ratings are actually better now than years ago
OFFLINE #60
Posted 24 October 2008 - 03:26 PM
"Network Ten was nearly folded into the Seven Network in the early 1990s, but due to the lobbying power of billionaire Kerry Packer, owner of the Nine Network, this was successfully resisted."
So what would happen now without that sort of lobbying power?


