Jump to content

   

Changes to Ratings - November 2011


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
124 replies to this topic

OFFLINE   Matlock #121

  • News Contributor

  • 6,080 posts since
  • September 2011

Posted 19 February 2012 - 05:48 PM

This is getting old. We're not going to get anything apart from the Top 20 unless someone wants to cough up some dough. Period.

OFFLINE   Ryan #122

  • Senior Site Administrator

  • 12,158 posts since
  • September 2005

Posted 19 February 2012 - 05:51 PM

When push comes to shove...we just want to see more meaningful figures. Crappy ABC2 children's shows tell us, and advertisers for that matter, nothing.


Advertisers aren't getting their ratings data from us, they're paying OzTam to get the full sets of data.
Ryan

Site Administrator

ryan@mediaspy.org

OFFLINE   bacco007 #123

  • Deputy Chief Administrator

  • 9,176 posts since
  • February 2005

Posted 19 February 2012 - 06:09 PM

When push comes to shove...we just want to see more meaningful figures. Crappy ABC2 children's shows tell us, and advertisers for that matter, nothing.


In fact it says a lot about the multichannelling strategy that the commercials have taken

OFFLINE   Go Wallabies #124

  • 238 posts since
  • September 2009

Posted 06 March 2012 - 11:09 AM

From the 2011 Ratings Season:

The Subscription figures are National not 5 City Metro, as the Super Rugby final got around 375k metro. Does this mean the daily figures we get are also National not just metro?

No, they're metro.


Since the Thursday 1st March thread the rating have been listed as National not 5 city metro, the audience numbers do not look much different than before. So was I right all this time assuming they were always National?

OFFLINE   Swanny #125

  • Retired Admin

  • 4,317 posts since
  • April 2008

Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:33 PM

Yes, they have always been national. The 5 city metro heading seen in the subscription figures beforehand was an error.