I do like PBL nine's watermark and the way it animates (we only see it on NineHD here) but the biggest problem is it too distracting and too big unlike WINs which is smaller and more transparent.
Watermark Me! Watermarks, watermarks, watermarks
#1201
Posted 12 April 2008 - 12:28 AM
I do like PBL nine's watermark and the way it animates (we only see it on NineHD here) but the biggest problem is it too distracting and too big unlike WINs which is smaller and more transparent.
#1202
Posted 12 April 2008 - 05:50 AM
It is 4:3 safe, dark as anything, looks old fashioned, isn't "flat", the HD looks ridiculous. I could go on forever. There is absolutely nothing at all that I like about the new Nine watermark or on-air presentation.
#1203
Posted 12 April 2008 - 07:42 AM
#1204
Posted 12 April 2008 - 12:37 PM
The WIN with out the dots is really growing on me I didn't think it would but I think I prefer it now (just looks polish)
#1205
Posted 12 April 2008 - 01:05 PM
Don't know which city you live in 'offline', but here in Sydney, WIN, as well as Prime from Wollongong, can be received across most of the metropolitan area on a permanent basis, depending on the location & the antenna setup.
Whilst I don't mind the Seven watermark (it's not as obtrusive as Nine's), I reckon that the Prime watermark is much better placed, being on the top right-hand corner as opposed to the bottom right-hand corner, and it's almost unnoticeable.
Who would've thought that WIN, who once had the most obtrusive watermark anywhere on Australian FTA, now has one of the least obtrusive watermarks on Australian FTA!
#1206
Posted 12 April 2008 - 01:38 PM
#1207
Posted 12 April 2008 - 03:27 PM
But remember before the worst watermark in Australia, the previous gold one in the top corner was also very unobtrusive, so they have pretty much come full circle in that regard.
#1208
Posted 12 April 2008 - 06:09 PM
But remember before the worst watermark in Australia, the previous gold one in the top corner was also very unobtrusive, so they have pretty much come full circle in that regard.
Oh yeah, I remember the watermark that WIN used for many years up until 1st September 2002. I thought that was WIN at its finest, as far as their watermark is concerned.
#1209
Posted 12 April 2008 - 10:37 PM
#1210
Posted 13 April 2008 - 09:47 AM
#1211
Posted 13 April 2008 - 10:04 AM
http://www.mediaspy.org/forum/index.php?sh...49&st=1175#
#1212
Posted 14 April 2008 - 09:04 PM
Southern Cross Darwin has no watermark for it's programs. I hate the Ten (Not SC Ten problem but I'll hate to think what there watermark would look like if they got a clean feed from Ten) logo (Really it's 'old' even the revamp logo I hate), however Prime's logo is good (pity Win wouldn't go back tp that watermark which was used in the late 90s IIRC) but Win watermark is better then it has been for sometime. Now all Win needs now is a clean feed from Nine (NNN, ACA and NineHD).
#1213
Posted 14 April 2008 - 09:59 PM
I wonder if DTD (Ten Darwin) would ever get a watermark? Does TDT (Ten Tasmania) ever have one? I don't ever recall Southern Cross here in Darwin having a watermark at all but Nine here does sport the same watermark as it does in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane.
William Walker
#1214
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:03 PM
#1215
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:08 PM
So you did have digital at the place? Anyway, yeah TDT is all just Ten branding, their "official" logo has "Tasmanian Digital Television" written in it, I've probably got a cap on an old tape somewhere but that branding hasn't been seen since their filler material in the adbreaks during the first year where they had loops of scenery and music until paid advertising came on. Once or twice they have also sponsored things like a music festival and use the full logo but the on-air presentation is all just ten's.
#1216
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:11 PM
#1217
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:32 PM
It was weird... the hotel is obviously getting digital because we had TDT and ABC2, but they must have rebroadcast it through the hotel in a way that it was only in 4:3, it was analogue quality, and the picture was distorted - did not fit the screen and parts of it were cut off.
#1218
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:36 PM
Attached File(s)
-
EyeTVSnapshot_14_.jpg (151.69K)
Number of downloads: 169
#1219
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:40 PM
#1220
Posted 15 April 2008 - 01:51 AM
Looks like the old Channel 9 (add the dots) HD watermark in Darwin but this time with out the 9 and dots!

Help
















