Help
Latest Headlines from The Spy Report
has occured in PerthEDIT: No news watermark as of yet
This post has been edited by picture.perfect: 26 March 2007 - 07:02 PM
Watermark Me! Watermarks, watermarks, watermarks
#601
picture.perfect 
- Group: Members
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 09-January 07
- Location:Sydney, NSW
Posted 26 March 2007 - 06:36 PM
Ten's HD watermark has occured in Perth
EDIT: No news watermark as of yet
has occured in PerthEDIT: No news watermark as of yet
#602
Media Munger
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,217
- Joined: 06-June 06
- Location:Wollongong, NSW
Posted 26 March 2007 - 06:58 PM
I flicked over to Ten on the weekend and was disspaointed to see the old sports watermark in use. I hadn't seen the new one yet.
#603
Norman
- Group: Members
- Posts: 7,765
- Joined: 03-October 06
- Location:Adelaide
Posted 26 March 2007 - 07:02 PM
Channel 12 now broadcasts the HD watermark 24/7, or close to that anyway.
Looks like Ten is moving to making most of its content HD now anyway (AFL, Neighbours, etc.)
Looks like Ten is moving to making most of its content HD now anyway (AFL, Neighbours, etc.)
This post has been edited by normangerman: 26 March 2007 - 07:02 PM
#605
Mawk
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4,829
- Joined: 22-December 04
- Location:Brisbane, QLD
Posted 27 March 2007 - 08:04 PM
QUOTE (Reuder7 @ Mar 27 2007, 08:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The 'LIVE' under the '7' is now in the new font also used for 'DIGITAL'. I don't like it! 
I don't think it looks any better than the previous font on 16:9, but I think it looks alot better on 4:3
#608
Otacon2009
- Group: Senior Members
- Posts: 3,140
- Joined: 02-March 06
Posted 28 March 2007 - 05:08 PM
Someone has fallen asleep at the Nine Darwin watermark switch!
This post has been edited by DarkMatter01: 28 March 2007 - 05:18 PM
#610
Squee!
- Group: Senior Members
- Posts: 6,440
- Joined: 21-December 05
Posted 28 March 2007 - 06:33 PM
QUOTE (DarkMatter01 @ Mar 28 2007, 03:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Someone has fallen asleep at the Nine Darwin watermark switch!
7 HD Digital In Perth last night was doing a flip.
The watermark came up during the ads then went off during the program (Mile High)
#611
Smacca
- Group: Senior Members
- Posts: 1,942
- Joined: 26-September 05
Posted 28 March 2007 - 07:45 PM
QUOTE (Boochan @ Mar 28 2007, 06:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
7 HD Digital In Perth last night was doing a flip.
The watermark came up during the ads then went off during the program (Mile High)
The watermark came up during the ads then went off during the program (Mile High)
That's a weird one!
#616
Reuder7
- Group: Members
- Posts: 14,411
- Joined: 03-February 05
Posted 30 March 2007 - 10:08 AM
QUOTE (chicki @ Mar 30 2007, 09:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How much longer until ten make the watermark solid? It is 
now. They need to turn the brightness down and move it to the 16:9 safe area at the very least.
now. They need to turn the brightness down and move it to the 16:9 safe area at the very least.It really is obtrusive. The evolution of the Ten watermark, thanks to LBM over at dtvforum.
#617
des
- Group: Members
- Posts: 403
- Joined: 13-April 05
- Location:Melbourne Victoria
Posted 30 March 2007 - 10:24 AM
It sucks that they have the watermark now , it really because they are to lazy to do seperate feeds for SD and HD as its all coming from the HD channel now thats why they have the shobby 4:3 logo, they even squish credits and stuff aswell! I miss the old style of TEN HD no logos and no stupid squishing credits!
This post has been edited by des: 30 March 2007 - 10:25 AM
#618
hosko
- Group: Members
- Posts: 241
- Joined: 10-September 06
Posted 30 March 2007 - 11:03 AM
QUOTE (des @ Mar 30 2007, 10:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It sucks that they have the watermark now , it really because they are to lazy to do seperate feeds for SD and HD as its all coming from the HD channel now thats why they have the shobby 4:3 logo, they even squish credits and stuff aswell! I miss the old style of TEN HD no logos and no stupid squishing credits!
Too lazy??
This is how it should be done, they are treating the HD service as their prime concern which is unlike any our station in this country. Get over it, they bug everyting else why would you think the wouldn't do their HD service. It was always on the cards as soon as enough people started to watch it or they started to do sport in HD, now both are happening
This post has been edited by hosko: 30 March 2007 - 02:44 PM
#619
Norman
- Group: Members
- Posts: 7,765
- Joined: 03-October 06
- Location:Adelaide
Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:38 PM
QUOTE (hosko @ Mar 30 2007, 10:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Too lazy??
This is how it should be done, they are treating the HD service as their prime concern which is unlike any our station in this country. Get over it, the bug everyting else why would you think the wouldn't do their HD service. I was always on the cards as soon as enough people started to watch it or they started to do sport in HD, now both are happening
This is how it should be done, they are treating the HD service as their prime concern which is unlike any our station in this country. Get over it, the bug everyting else why would you think the wouldn't do their HD service. I was always on the cards as soon as enough people started to watch it or they started to do sport in HD, now both are happening
Yes, the way they are doing it is more effective. Efficiency = Less costs, more concistency and less stuff-ups. You wouldn't think the RTP graphic from when the HD channel started would be well accepted in, say another 5 years or so. They're trying to get some concistency across the system.
