Forums: Watermark Me! - Forums

Jump to content

  • (126 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Watermark Me! Watermarks, watermarks, watermarks

#951 User is offline   Andyt31 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 11-December 07

Posted 09 January 2008 - 03:01 PM

QUOTE (ATNI @ Jan 5 2008, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We know mate. It's been like that since the Boxing Day test match.


its a good coverup for the dotty 9 logo if Win was going to get the dots they would have done same time as 9 for the wwos logo looks better then 2 water marks over the top of each other wouldn't look so good
might as well go back to just having the nine wwos logo and forget havingf win version dunno why win even bothered having the 9 wws logo all those years cold have put win on top of 9 wm simialar to Prime wm on top of 7 sport wm win dosn't have to be big just a bit smaller then there Normal WM

#952 User is offline   Media Munger 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,217
  • Joined: 06-June 06
  • Location:Wollongong, NSW

Posted 09 January 2008 - 04:14 PM

QUOTE (Andyt31 @ Jan 9 2008, 04:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
its a good coverup for the dotty 9 logo if Win was going to get the dots they would have done same time as 9 for the wwos logo looks better then 2 water marks over the top of each other wouldn't look so good
might as well go back to just having the nine wwos logo and forget havingf win version dunno why win even bothered having the 9 wws logo all those years cold have put win on top of 9 wm simialar to Prime wm on top of 7 sport wm win dosn't have to be big just a bit smaller then there Normal WM

It might be just me but mate, I have no idea what you just said. laugh.gif

#953 User is offline   Andyt31 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 11-December 07

Posted 09 January 2008 - 07:02 PM

QUOTE (ATNI @ Jan 9 2008, 05:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It might be just me but mate, I have no idea what you just said. laugh.gif


when i read other peoples postings half i got no idea what there on about laugh.gif

#954 User is offline   mcp 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,691
  • Joined: 11-May 03
  • Location:North of the Border

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:06 PM

breakdown in the universal translator. I don't understand you either Andyt31.

#955 User is offline   regionaltv 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,314
  • Joined: 22-June 05
  • Location:

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:29 PM

If I interpreted it correctly... Andyt31 was implying that IF the WIN Network was going to adopt the dots, they would have placed a dotted WWOS watermark on, during the Cricket clean feed. However, since they didn't, it's a clear indication that they won't be implementing a dotted logo on Monday. Andy, please confirm if this is indeed what you were trying to say.

#956 User is offline   Mike 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 15,269
  • Joined: 31-January 06
  • Location:Victoria

Posted 10 January 2008 - 10:24 AM

QUOTE (ATNI @ Jan 9 2008, 05:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It might be just me but mate, I have no idea what you just said. laugh.gif


Pot... meet kettle.

#957 User is offline   Super Simpsons 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 4,552
  • Joined: 17-July 04
  • Location:Sydney, NSW

Posted 10 January 2008 - 11:54 AM

Play nice all. cheerful.gif

#958 User is offline   Media Munger 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,217
  • Joined: 06-June 06
  • Location:Wollongong, NSW

Posted 10 January 2008 - 12:32 PM

QUOTE (Mike 360 @ Jan 10 2008, 11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Pot... meet kettle.

Do you have no idea what I say all the time?

#959 User is offline   TGIF 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 11,422
  • Joined: 29-October 06

Posted 10 January 2008 - 12:41 PM

Might be a nice idea to move on..

What do we think Nine are going to do with their watermark post-relaunch? I hope they don't go back to the old HD one..

#960 User is offline   MICK 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 546
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 10 January 2008 - 02:44 PM

What did the old HD one look like??

#961 User is offline   Fyturis 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,050
  • Joined: 06-June 07
  • Location:BRISBANE

Posted 10 January 2008 - 02:55 PM

hopefully it looks fine.

#962 User is offline   offline 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 299
  • Joined: 24-March 07

Posted 10 January 2008 - 03:14 PM

QUOTE (MICK @ Jan 10 2008, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What did the old HD one look like??


It changed depending on location, Sydney seemed smaller but much brighter. These caps were from Channel Nine Melbourne.

Nine HDTV Watermark Left (Used for the demo loop at times)

Attached File  nine_hdtv_left_watermark.jpg (422.31K)
Number of downloads: 158

Nine HDTV Watermark Right (Normal programming)

Attached File  nine_hdtv_normal_right_watermark.jpg (211.84K)
Number of downloads: 152

Nine High Definition Watermark (The version most people will remember)

Attached File  nine_high_definition_watermark.png (49.82K)
Number of downloads: 147

Nine High Definition Watermark Changes (Shows the position changed not too long before the end of the dots - they moved it inwards)

Attached File  nine_high_definition_watermark_change.jpg (25.85K)
Number of downloads: 151

#963 User is offline   Mike 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 15,269
  • Joined: 31-January 06
  • Location:Victoria

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:05 PM

What's wrong with that?

#964 User is offline   Mike 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 15,269
  • Joined: 31-January 06
  • Location:Victoria

Posted 14 January 2008 - 04:24 PM

I like Nine's new watermark. The edge effect on it is nice. Just lower the opacity. And as mentioned in the other thread the HD logo needs to be changed. have HD under or above not next to as its too long.

#965 User is offline   Moe 

  • Forum Moderator
  • Group: Site Staff
  • Posts: 5,065
  • Joined: 22-August 04

Posted 14 January 2008 - 04:53 PM

I think if they did it in CBS style, that is dark with the bevelling to add depth and more transparent it would be great. At the moment it is way too bright.

#966 User is offline   Mawk 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,829
  • Joined: 22-December 04
  • Location:Brisbane, QLD

Posted 14 January 2008 - 10:53 PM

Here is a watermark comparison from all 3 commercial HD Channels.
Nine's is almost twice the length.

Attached File(s)

  • Attached File  hd.jpg (6.86K)
    Number of downloads: 117


#967 User is offline   Mike 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 15,269
  • Joined: 31-January 06
  • Location:Victoria

Posted 14 January 2008 - 11:58 PM

Plus the HD lacks the outline effect of the dotty. They don't match!

#968 User is offline   Moe 

  • Forum Moderator
  • Group: Site Staff
  • Posts: 5,065
  • Joined: 22-August 04

Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:33 PM

The Nine HD watermark is different:
Attached File  snapshot20080121222725.jpg (172.73K)
Number of downloads: 124
Still 4:3 safe crazy.gif

Nine had this ridiculous watermark during CSI (cap thanks to McDigital on the DTV Forums):
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/7696/20...21203649jm8.jpg

#969 User is offline   Mike 

  • Group: Senior Members
  • Posts: 15,269
  • Joined: 31-January 06
  • Location:Victoria

Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:49 PM

What's the point of 4:3 Watermarks on HD??? Stupidity.

#970 User is offline   Norman 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,765
  • Joined: 03-October 06
  • Location:Adelaide

Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:56 PM

NWS9 HD Watermark

Attached File(s)



Share this topic:


  • (126 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users